<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Internet Works Backwards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youell.com/matt/writing/?feed=rss2&#038;p=171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youell.com/matt/writing/?p=171</link>
	<description>simplify</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 04:08:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.youell.com/matt/writing/?p=171&#038;cpage=1#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youell.com/matt/writing/?p=171#comment-231</guid>
		<description>@tylersticka your experimental app wouldn&#039;t cost you anything. On the contrary, you would get a very small slice of the pie. The consumers still would pay a fixed amount for bandwidth, the ISPs would just distribute a portion of the money collected from consumers to those sites where traffic flowed above a certain amount.

Maybe a firm example would help. Let&#039;s say my ISP has 100 consumers at a dollar a day, and 3 of my fellow consumers spend 5% of their time for 10 days on your site. 3 x 10 * 0.05 means you get $1.50. Totally bogus numbers, to be sure. It would be more like fractions of a cent at that level. But the point is that you would make money. This could trickle down and follow the network. So your hosting provider might get a cut, and the carrier would to. It&#039;s kind of like network marketing except there is an real network and actual value being transmitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tylersticka your experimental app wouldn&#8217;t cost you anything. On the contrary, you would get a very small slice of the pie. The consumers still would pay a fixed amount for bandwidth, the ISPs would just distribute a portion of the money collected from consumers to those sites where traffic flowed above a certain amount.</p>
<p>Maybe a firm example would help. Let&#8217;s say my ISP has 100 consumers at a dollar a day, and 3 of my fellow consumers spend 5% of their time for 10 days on your site. 3 x 10 * 0.05 means you get $1.50. Totally bogus numbers, to be sure. It would be more like fractions of a cent at that level. But the point is that you would make money. This could trickle down and follow the network. So your hosting provider might get a cut, and the carrier would to. It&#8217;s kind of like network marketing except there is an real network and actual value being transmitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Sticka</title>
		<link>http://www.youell.com/matt/writing/?p=171&#038;cpage=1#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Sticka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youell.com/matt/writing/?p=171#comment-230</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an intriguing idea! My worry is that a system like this would keep me from doing fun little experiments like Portwiture that only get 80 hits a day, but are a fun exercise and learning experience. YouTube has the resources (namely, Google) to pay the exorbitant fees; I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an intriguing idea! My worry is that a system like this would keep me from doing fun little experiments like Portwiture that only get 80 hits a day, but are a fun exercise and learning experience. YouTube has the resources (namely, Google) to pay the exorbitant fees; I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
